This lack of malice is proven in the simple definition of retribution: The death penalty puts the scales of justice back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal. The morality of the death penalty has been hotly debated for many years. Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance.
It is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime. The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US.
Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain Bosner ; this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates do not physically suffer. Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible.
The eighth amendment to the United States Constitution prevents cruel and unusual punishment. Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution. As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form.
After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in hospitals on a daily basis and no one is calling it unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In the case of Furman v. The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid.
Another argument put forth by death penalty abolitionists is the possibility of executing an innocent person.
Many people that argue this overestimate how often this happens, it is an extremely rare occurrence and has not happened since the death penalty was reintroduced in Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof. We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. Stewart points out that death penalty cases are held to a much higher standard.
Due process in these cases takes much longer so that the court can be absolutely sure that the person is guilty before sentencing him to execution. This helps to eliminate any errors that could lead to executing the wrong person.
He also points out that although there is a small possibility for mistakes to be made, this does not mean capital punishment should be abolished. If everything that had the potential for harmful mistakes were outlawed, society would be extremely crippled. It is true that there is disproportionality when it comes to the races and classes that most frequently receive the death penalty. It has been proven that minorities and those with lower income levels are overrepresented on death row.
This is not due to discrimination; this is due to the higher rate at which these groups commit crime ProCon. It has been argued that poverty breeds criminality; if this is true then it makes sense that those at a lower income level would more frequently be sentenced to execution than those at higher income levels ProCon.
It has also been proven that minorities are disproportionately poor, and therefore they would also be more likely to receive the death penalty. Ernest van den Haag said it best:. The only relevant question is: Whether or not others deserved the same punishment, whatever the economic or racial group, have avoided execution is irrelevant.
It does not matter what race or economic status a person is, if he is guilty he must receive the appropriate punishment, which in some cases may be the death penalty. Capital punishment can be a difficult topic to approach because people tend to have extreme views on it. The death penalty is an asset to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral.
The arguments against the death penalty often do not hold up when examined more closely. It is important that the nation is united on this issue, rather than having some states use capital punishment while others do not. The death penalty can be an extremely useful tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society. It is imperative that we begin to pass legislation making capital punishment legal throughout the United States so that justice can be served properly.
The Case for Justice. Criminals rarely think about the consequences of their actions and this is especially true with crimes of passion. By killing felons, the death penalty removes the burden of housing them within the penitentiary system. Prison overcrowding and overstretched resources are key issues in prisons in many countries. And if they were paroled, there is always the chance they could re-offend, which is completely eliminated with the death penalty.
The concept of retribution, that the perpetrator is punished in a manner fitting to the crime, is also used to support the death penalty. There are many arguments against the death penalty that are both practical and ethical. It is very difficult to know the exact moral status of the death penalty, though many see it to be a degrading, barbaric, and amoral.
The opponents of the death penalty argue that it causes incredible suffering and pain for the sentenced and brutalizes society as a whole where it operates. Both of these factors could have negative effects on crime and criminality. The vast majority of people would at least argue that human life is highly valuable and should be preserved, though the extent at which preservation should make-way for retribution is where things become very debatable.
The up front costs of the death penalty are a lot higher than equivalent life without parole cases, but JFA: Cost comparisons are only valid if you compare the costs of death penalty to life without parole cases. Many people believe that costs to appeal a death penalty case are high. Even though abolitionists have greatly exaggerated the cost of death penalty cases, death penalty cases still prove to be a lot less expensive over time than death penalty equivalent life without parole cases.
Death penalty costs are mainly appeals costs, and life without parole prisoners get the same appeals and should be considered to bear the same costs. My second reason for supporting capital punishment is that it deters crime. Studies over the past dozen years have shown that capital punishment is a deterrent to murder. They say that between 3 and 18 lives would be saved by the execution of each convicted killer. Abolitionists claim that people are just as safe when murderers are in prison, but some of them recruit other people to kill while they are there.
Some prisoners kill guards, and other inmates. In the Philadelphia Industrial Correction Center in , a man was serving two life sentences, and was sentenced to three more after he was convicted of stabbing three prison guards.
Or, in , when a Beeville, Texas prison guard was killed by an inmate already serving a sentence for murder. At the Florida State Prison in Starke in , Two death row inmates were killed by their fellow inmates. Murderers end up getting out because of law changes, parole board changes, and because people forget the past. A man named James Moore raped and strangled 14 year old Pamela Moss in Her parents decided not to go with the death penalty as long as he got life without parole, but thanks to a change in sentencing laws in , James Moore is eligible for parole every two years.
He was sentenced to life in prison after the U. S Supreme court struck down the death penalty as then imposed. McDuff was released in when Texas prisons were overflowing. Within days, the naked body of a 31 year old prostitute named Sarafia Parker had shown up in a field near Temple, beaten and strangled. Jailed after a minor racial incident, he got past the system and was out again in Texas prostitutes began disappearing.
One, a 22 year old woman named Valencia Joshua was last seen alive February 24, Her body was discovered in a shallow grave decomposed in some woods behind the college. Colleen Reed disappeared from a car wash in Austin during the Christmas Holidays in , and witnesses reported hearing a woman screaming that night and seeing two men speeding away in a yellow or tan thunderbird.
Melissa Northrup disappeared on March 1, , a little more than two months later, from the Waco convenience store where she worked. McDuff was the target of a nationwide manhunt. In , a Seguin jury assessed him the death penalty for the abduction-rape-murder of Colleen Reed.
He was finally executed on November 17th, by lethal injection. It implies there is something more inhuman and barbarous, than the mere extinguishment of life. Capital punishment says to them: We, the community, take your loss with the utmost seriousness.
We know that you are filled with rage and pain.
Persuasive Essay Why Capital Punishment Should Remain in Effect Stefanie Ridgway DeVry University, ENGL Professor Adams April 19, Capital punishment, otherwise known as the death penalty, has been effective tool in our country’s justice system since its inception.
Pro Capital Punishment. March 29, Get involved in supporting capital punishment by contacting books-wrfd.tk, and by writing to your congressperson. good lil essay y'got here.
Pro Capital Punishment Every day Americans learn about crimes such as rape, murders, terrorism, and kidnappings. Capital Punishment is a good penalty for those criminals who commit these harsh crimes. /5(6). Capital Punishment -- Pro essaysThesis Statement: Although the opponents of capital punishment believe this to be immoral and non-productive, advocates of capital punishment have proven this to be a cost effective, and ethically correct deterrent of future murders. II. Pros of capital punishm.
Category: Argumentative Persuasive Essays; Title: Capital Punishment Essay - Benefits of the Death Penalty. My Account. Capital Punishment Essay - Benefits of the Death Penalty Pro Capital Punishment Essays] Research Papers words ( pages) Related Searches. The Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment Essay Words | 4 Pages. The Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment Since the mid ’s, capital punishment has brought many individuals into many diverse view points throughout the years. Capital punishment is a way of punishing a convict by killing him or her because of the crime he or she committed.